skill-quality-reviewer

Evaluate Claude Skills by analyzing YAML frontmatter and structure to generate quality reports.

2|Updated Apr 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Clay-HHK/claude-config --skill skill-quality-reviewer-clay-hhk
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-quality-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Clay-HHK/claude-config/tree/main/skills/skill-quality-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Clay-HHK/claude-config --skill skill-quality-reviewer-clay-hhk

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the challenge of validating and improving Claude Skills by providing a structured, repeatable quality assessment that highlights strengths and identifies concrete improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated quality scoring across four dimensions (description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity) with weighted scores and clear grade guidance.
  • Actionable improvement plans that map issues to exact file locations (e.g., SKILL.md, references/, scripts/) and suggest concrete edits.
  • Pre-publish quality checks for skills before sharing or deployment, plus audit workflows for ongoing quality tracking.

Quick Start

Provide the path to a skill (e.g., ./skills/skill-name) to generate a quality report and improvement plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-quality-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate the quality of a Claude Skill before sharing?

To evaluate a Claude Skill, load its SKILL.md file to extract and validate the YAML frontmatter, then compute weighted dimension scores for description, organization, style, and structure to generate a standardized quality report.

What is the best way to audit documentation quality in a local skills repository?

Auditing documentation quality in a local skills repository involves analyzing the YAML frontmatter and structural integrity of each SKILL.md file, producing both a comprehensive quality report and a targeted improvement plan.

How does the weighted scoring system for skill quality evaluation work?

The weighted scoring system evaluates skill quality by assigning percentage weights to four dimensions: Description (25%), Organization (30%), Style (20%), and Structure (25%), calculating a final standardized grade.

Can I generate an improvement plan that points to exact file locations in my skill directory?

Yes, generating an improvement plan maps identified issues to exact file locations within your skill directory, such as SKILL.md, references/, and scripts/, and suggests concrete edits to resolve them.

What do I need to provide to run a skill quality assessment?

You need to provide the local directory path to the skill you want to assess, such as ./skills/skill-name, so the tool can load the SKILL.md file and validate its YAML frontmatter.

Are there limitations to evaluating skills without valid YAML frontmatter?

Evaluating skills without valid YAML frontmatter limits the assessment because the tool relies on extracting the name and description fields from the YAML to compute the description quality score.