skill-quality-reviewer

To evaluate Claude Skill quality before publishing, use automated quality scoring across description, organization, style, and structure dimensions to generate grades and actionable improvement plans.

The best way to assess documentation quality for multiple skills is running batch analyses that produce structured YAML quality reports with weighted scores, grades, and prioritized improvement items.

Yes, you can generate an improvement plan for a specific skill file by analyzing its structural integrity and writing style to receive concrete, file-level guidance with progress tracking.

Evaluating skill organization and style scores four dimensions: description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity, producing weighted results for clear benchmarking.

The skill quality reviewer outputs structured YAML metadata containing fields such as name, tagline, description, request, complexity, category, keywords, dependencies, components, and toxicity_check.

You need a quality assessment for your Claude Skills portfolio to quantify and improve content standards, enabling governance, pre-publish checks, and portfolio reviews with structured benchmarking.