skill-review

Evaluate skill artifacts by applying a formal rubric across seven dimensions: format compliance, scope clarity, actionability, completeness, token efficiency, prescriptive voice, and negative guidance. This process ensures standardization and identifies gaps for improvement.

Cross-skill coherence detects overlap, contradictions, and reference integrity issues across co-loaded skills. Validating coherence prevents conflicts and ensures multiple skills operate reliably together without contradicting instructions.

You can run rigorous independent health checks on skills without telemetry data. The rubric-guided evaluation provides structural review results to guide improvement methodology without relying on runtime usage metrics.

The best way to maintain quality during skill modification is applying a formal rubric review. This enforces evaluation dimensions and reference integrity while flagging potential risks and token impact introduced by the changes.

Skill evaluation works for periodic health checks across co-loaded skills. It concretely enforces seven evaluation dimensions, cross-skill coherence, and reference integrity to maintain reliability over time.