skills-qa

Evaluate skills against the Legal Skill Design Framework for readiness.

Updated May 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill skills-qa-gtgspot
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skills-qa
Source: https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal/tree/main/legal-builder-hub/skills/skills-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/gtgspot/clegal --skill skills-qa-gtgspot

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluates a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework to determine readiness for adoption, surfacing gaps before installation and deployment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated evaluation against thirteen design parameters, including trust surface, freshness, schema, and conflicts.
  • Dependency and risk mapping for downstream workflows and teams.
  • Output suitable for stakeholder review to decide whether to trust, upgrade, or reject a skill before rollout.

Quick Start

Provide the path to a full skill directory or SKILL.md content to begin the QA evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions about skills-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a skill for legal risk before deployment?

Skill readiness evaluation applies the Legal Skill Design Framework to community and first-party skills. It checks thirteen design parameters and three legal-specific failure modes to output dependency maps, risk assessments, and a readiness verdict for adoption decisions.

When do I need a skill assessment for install-time decisions?

Skill assessment is needed for install-time decisions when adopting community skills from registries or deploying first-party team skills. Evaluating readiness beforehand prevents deploying components with unmanaged legal risks or dependency conflicts.

Can I use a legal design framework to check community skills from registries?

Yes, you can evaluate community skills from registries using the Legal Skill Design Framework. The evaluation maps dependencies, assesses risks across thirteen parameters, and outputs a readiness verdict to guide install-time and deployment decisions.

What is the best way to map dependencies and risks for skill adoption?

The best way to map dependencies and risks for skill adoption is to run an automated evaluation against the Legal Skill Design Framework. This generates dependency maps and risk assessments across thirteen parameters to help stakeholders decide whether to trust, upgrade, or reject a skill.

Does skill readiness evaluation check for schema and freshness conflicts?

Yes, skill readiness evaluation checks for schema and freshness conflicts. It assesses thirteen design parameters, including the trust surface and schema, to identify conflicts and three legal-specific failure modes before deployment.