skills-qa

Evaluate legal skills for design quality, trust-surface risk, and dependency integrity.

Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal --skill skills-qa-jrhueiueng
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skills-qa
Source: https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal/tree/main/plugins/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal/skills/legal-builder-hub__skills-qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jrhueiueng/codex-for-legal --skill skills-qa-jrhueiueng

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you evaluate whether a legal workflow skill is well-designed and safe to install, before you let it run on real attorney workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Trust and design evaluation: Scores a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework across thirteen design parameters, including trust-surface, freshness signals, schema expectations, and conflict detection.
  • Dependency and trigger mapping: Builds an upstream/downstream/auto-trigger dependency map by inspecting the skill directory structure (where available).
  • Security-focused heuristic scanning: Performs a prompt-injection heuristic scan to surface red-flag text patterns in the skill content, especially across updates.
  • Actionable verdicting: Returns a three-band outcome (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns) and a refusal mode when high-risk evidence is detected.

Quick Start

Use the skills-qa skill to assess a prospective skill by pointing it at the skill directory or pasting its SKILL.md content, then review the produced verdict and any flagged findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about skills-qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate if a legal workflow skill is safe to install?

To evaluate if a legal workflow skill is safe to install, analyze its SKILL.md and related artifacts for design quality, trust-surface risk, dependency integrity, and schema validity to produce a structured readiness verdict.

What is a trust-surface risk assessment for legal skills?

A trust-surface risk assessment scores a legal skill against a design framework to identify safety issues, checking schema expectations, freshness signals, and conflict detection before allowing it to run on attorney workflows.

How do I check a legal skill for prompt injection vulnerabilities?

To check a legal skill for prompt injection vulnerabilities, perform a heuristic scan of the skill content to surface red-flag text patterns across updates and flag potential security risks.

Can I map dependencies for a legal skill before deploying it?

Yes, you can map dependencies for a legal skill by inspecting the skill directory structure to build upstream, downstream, and auto-trigger dependency maps for conflict detection.

What is the best way to detect overlap between a new skill and existing legal skills?

The best way to detect overlap between a new skill and existing legal skills is to analyze the candidate skill directory and optionally the local practice-profile context to identify functional conflicts.

When should I refuse to install a legal workflow skill?

You should refuse to install a legal workflow skill when high-risk evidence is detected during evaluation, triggering a refusal mode instead of returning a Ready, Some Concern, or Material Concerns verdict.