slide-excellence

To run a slide quality review, provide a slide file such as a Quarto .qmd file. The system applies parallel evaluations across visual, pedagogical, and proofreading agents, generating structured quality reports and a consolidated summary.

A pedagogical review evaluates narrative flow, pacing, and instructional clarity against established patterns. It checks how well the slide deck communicates educational content and identifies areas where teaching effectiveness can be improved.

Yes, you can check Quarto slide files for visual consistency and typography. The visual audit checks layout consistency, typography, spacing, and image quality, while the proofreading agent scans for grammar and terminology consistency.

Yes, the slide review includes optional TikZ, parity, and substance reviews. These checks verify TikZ correctness, parity with source materials, and domain accuracy, adding deeper technical validation to the standard quality reports.

The best way to get a consolidated summary is to submit the slide file for a multi-agent review. The system generates per-file reports under a quality_reports directory and returns a combined summary for quick decision making.

The slide proofreading and visual audit focus on grammar, terminology consistency, layout, and image quality. They do not replace human subject matter review, and complex TikZ or substance issues require enabling the optional specialized review agents.