social-engineering

Social engineering testing assesses human-factor security risks through controlled phishing, pretexting, vishing, and physical security simulations. These campaigns evaluate user awareness and identify manipulation vulnerabilities to guide training and policy improvements.

Run authorized phishing or vishing campaigns by defining a clear scope, securing authorizations, executing the simulation, and capturing evidence. This process generates reports that identify gaps and enable targeted remediation for user awareness.

Yes, social engineering simulations require clearly defined scope and authorization workflows before execution. This ensures compliant testing while capturing evidence and generating reports to guide security remediation and policy improvements.

The best way to capture evidence during pretexting or physical security testing is through controlled campaign workflows. This evidence collection directly enables report generation to guide training and policy improvements for human-factor defenses.

Social engineering simulations should not be used without clearly defined scope, authorizations, and evidence capture workflows. Attempting security testing without these controlled prerequisites prevents compliant execution and limits actionable remediation reporting.