Socratic Architect - 苏格拉底式架构师

Requirements clarification validates the necessity and true purpose of features by posing probing questions across five hierarchical layers: Essence, Assumptions, Simplicity, Consistency, and Boundaries. This prevents design flaws and technical debt.

The Socratic method for architecture review is a deep-thinking process that guides you to critically analyze requirements, challenge implicit assumptions, and ensure architectural alignment. It systematically uncovers hidden problems before development begins.

You identify edge cases and explore simpler alternatives by applying design questioning across defined boundaries. This process prompts for more effective approaches and tests underlying beliefs about the proposed solution.

You need to challenge implicit assumptions when proposing new solutions or mechanics. Deep questioning tests underlying beliefs about the problem, ensuring a robust approach and preventing flawed designs before coding starts.

Yes, requirements analysis works for evaluating new game mechanics by deeply questioning the mechanic's purpose, exploring if simpler mechanics suffice, and identifying potential conflicts with existing systems.

The best way to prevent technical debt is systematically questioning requirements and proposed solutions across essence, assumptions, simplicity, consistency, and boundaries. This ensures a well-thought-out approach before implementation.