What problem does it solve?
It solves passive studying by forcing active retrieval practice, where you must answer first and then defend your reasoning before you get confirmation.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Question-driven learning: turns a topic into a rule-statement hypo and iteratively challenges your answers so you practice applying legal rules.
- Reasoning-focused correction: pushes back on sloppy logic without simply “giving the right answer,” and narrows via follow-ups when you’re stuck.
- Contradiction detection against your own notes: if your stated rule conflicts with rules found in your uploaded materials, it surfaces the conflict so you must reconcile which version is correct.
- Real-matter safeguard: detects real-world facts like names, deadlines, parties, addresses, and dollar amounts and redirects away from legal advice into general study support.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Exam prep practice: drill contracts, torts, or procedure topics using increasingly difficult hypotheticals to build accuracy under pressure.
- Weak-area recovery: uses your prior CLAUDE learning context to pick the topic you avoid or consistently miss.
- Skill-style study: “drill me” sessions where you answer, get pushed back, and confirm only when you reach the right reasoning.
Quick Start
Ask for socratic drilling on the topic you want to practice, then answer each hypo and let the skill push you with follow-ups until you reach correct, well-reasoned application.
