What problem does it solve? Law students often mistake passive reading for learning and only discover gaps in understanding during exams. This Skill forces active recall by asking questions, challenging sloppy reasoning, and refusing to hand over answers before the student has earned them. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Socratic Questioning: Poses rule-based hypotheticals on a chosen legal topic and follows up with progressively harder variations. - Reasoning Pushback: Challenges vague answers, calls out guessing, and narrows questions when the student is stuck instead of revealing the rule. - Contradiction Detection: Flags when a stated rule conflicts with the student's own uploaded notes, outlines, or case briefs, quoting the exact passage. - Real-Matter Guardrail: Detects questions about real legal situations (leases, tickets, deadlines) and redirects to licensed legal help instead of giving advice. - Use Case: A 1L preparing for a contracts exam says "drill me on consideration" and works through a chain of hypotheticals until their rule statements and application are exam-ready. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to drill you on a legal topic, for example: "Drill me on consideration using the socratic-drill skill."
