socratic-review

Socratic code review improves legacy code design by using guided questioning to help you identify architectural smells and responsibility issues. It transitions from deep diagnosis to concrete refactoring plans, ensuring you understand the reasoning behind each change.

Identifying architectural smells in a pull request requires a multi-layered diagnosis that analyzes coupling, responsibility, and performance. This approach synthesizes findings before initiating a collaborative discussion to resolve design flaws and improve maintainability.

Yes, you can use Socratic questioning for security vulnerabilities during code review. It facilitates a deep dialogue that guides developers to discover and resolve security flaws through inquiry rather than passive reporting across self-authored or inherited codebases.

To start a code review session, provide the path to the file or diff you want analyzed. The system will perform a silent diagnostic analysis to map problem spaces, then return initial diagnostic questions to begin the collaborative refactoring process.

Socratic code review works across diverse codebases including self-authored code, pull requests, and legacy systems. It acts as a senior partner to help you discover issues in your own work, ensuring design and maintainability improvements regardless of code origin.