software-architecture

To choose your software architecture, you need a trade-off analysis comparing microservices and monolith patterns based on scalability needs. This approach evaluates your project requirements and team structure to recommend the right architecture pattern and technology stack.

An ADR (Architecture Decision Record) is a document capturing architectural choices and their rationale. You need ADRs when making multi-team architecture decisions or monolith refactors, ensuring stakeholders align on design outcomes and trade-offs.

You generate an architecture plan by selecting a pattern like MVC, microservices, or event-driven, then defining a technology stack. This produces an ADR-driven plan documenting your architectural choices and enforcing SOLID principles.

Yes, this architecture design approach supports monolith refactoring by applying architectural best practices and SOLID principles. It provides pattern guidance and decision tracking to guide multi-team architecture decisions during the refactor.

The best way to document trade-off analysis is using ADR templates to record architectural choices and rationale. This framework aligns multi-team stakeholders on technology stack recommendations and evolving system decisions.

You should avoid microservices architecture when a trade-off analysis reveals insufficient team scaling needs or complexity overhead. Using ADR templates to document these architectural decisions ensures you select the right pattern, such as MVC or monolith.