skills.rest
spike-land-ai
spike-land-aiOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

software-code-review

Guide structured code reviews with checklists, templates, and P0-P3 risk ratings.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#templates#security#patterns#checklists#quality-assurance#code-review#pull-request
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/spike-land-ai/spike.land --skill software-code-review-spike-land-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: software-code-review
Source: https://github.com/spike-land-ai/spike.land/tree/main/.github/skills/software-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/spike-land-ai/spike.land --skill software-code-review-spike-land-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Streamline and standardize code reviews by providing proven patterns, checklists, and templates that help teams assess correctness, security, readability, performance, and maintainability across languages and stacks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Operational checklists and prompts for security, correctness, maintainability, performance, and readability.
  • Specialized guidance for platform- or framework-specific reviews (e.g., .NET/EF Core crypto rules) via linked references.
  • Templates and outputs that structure PR comments, review notes, and decision-making with risk severities (P0-P3).
  • Multi-mode review workflow guidance, including when to apply security-first, correctness, performance, and maintainability perspectives.

Quick Start

Provide a PR or diff review by applying the recommended modes to generate a structured assessment and actionable improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about software-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize pull request reviews across different programming languages?▼

Standardize pull request reviews by applying operational checklists and templates that assess security, correctness, and readability across languages and stacks. This generates structured PR comments with risk severities from P0 to P3 to guide MR conversations.

What is the best way to structure code review comments with risk ratings?▼

Structure code review comments using templated outputs that assign risk ratings from P0 to P3. This approach helps reviewers prioritize actionable improvements and clearly communicate decision-making within pull requests.

Can I use generic code review checklists for framework-specific security rules like .NET and EF Core?▼

Yes, generic code review checklists can be extended for framework-specific rules like .NET and EF Core crypto requirements. The skill provides specialized guidance via linked references to address platform-specific security concerns.

How do I run a security-first code review on a new diff?▼

Run a security-first code review on a diff by applying the security mode from the multi-mode review workflow. This generates a structured assessment focusing on vulnerability detection and actionable improvements.

When should I switch between correctness, performance, and maintainability modes during a code review?▼

Switch between correctness, performance, and maintainability modes based on the diff context and ongoing maintenance needs. The multi-mode review workflow guides when to apply each perspective to evaluate code quality comprehensively.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
HCMUTE-RTICHCMUTE-RTIC

git-pr-workflows-pr-enhance

Generate pull request descriptions, review checklists, and risk assessments from code changes.

Official
Advanced
jwbaldwinjwbaldwin

code-review

Review GitLab Merge Requests for code quality and maintainability issues.

Community
Advanced
BoraPerusicBoraPerusic

code-reviewer

Automate expert code review for multi-language codebases and pull requests.

Community
Advanced
CENKSSSCENKSSS

pentest-validation

Validate SAST and DAST vulnerability exploitability through a 4-phase pipeline.

Community
Advanced