Software Safety Classification and Architectural Impact

Derive IEC 62304 safety classes from hazard analysis and apply them to architecture.

26|6|Updated Jan 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AminAlam/meddev-agent-skills --skill software-safety-classification-and-architectural-impact
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Software Safety Classification and Architectural Impact
Source: https://github.com/AminAlam/meddev-agent-skills/tree/main/architecture/safety-classification
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AminAlam/meddev-agent-skills --skill software-safety-classification-and-architectural-impact

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that software safety classification directly influences architectural decisions, documentation, and testing rigor, preventing over- or under-engineering of safety controls.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Risk-Based Design: Tailors architectural segregation, interface design, and verification efforts based on IEC 62304 safety classes (A, B, C).
  • Traceability: Establishes clear links between hazards, risk controls, and the implemented software architecture.
  • Use Case: When developing a Class C medical device component, this skill guides the implementation of strict memory protection, validated inter-process communication, and rigorous testing to ensure failures are contained and do not compromise patient safety.

Quick Start

Apply the software safety classification skill to ensure architectural segregation for Class C components.

Frequently Asked Questions about Software Safety Classification and Architectural Impact

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does IEC 62304 software safety classification impact medical device architecture?

IEC 62304 software safety classification impacts medical device architecture by scaling architectural segregation, interface contracts, and testing rigor according to Class A, B, or C risk levels. This prevents over- or under-engineering safety controls.

How do I implement architectural segregation for Class C medical device software?

Implement architectural segregation for Class C medical device software by deriving classification from hazard analysis and establishing strict boundaries. This guides implementation of memory protection and validated inter-process communication to contain failures.

When do I need to re-evaluate software safety classification during development?

Re-evaluate software safety classification upon functional changes to the medical device software. This ensures architectural segregation, interface contracts, and verification rigor remain correctly scaled to the updated hazard analysis.

How should SOUP and third-party tools be evaluated for Class B and Class C components?

Evaluate SOUP and third-party tools by assessing their impact on Class B and Class C software items. This ensures pre-existing components do not compromise strict interface contracts and segregation boundaries required by the safety classification.

Does IEC 62304 classification require traceability between hazards and software architecture?

Yes, IEC 62304 classification requires establishing clear traceability between hazards, risk controls, and the implemented software architecture. This aligns evidence and verification rigor with the determined safety class.