What problem does it solve?
Published solicitations often drift from their source Project Design Document (PDD), lack required fields, have unrealistic deadlines, use generic evaluation criteria, or ask applicants for information only internal teams can provide—leading to failed procurements, no valid responses, or wasted time for all parties. This Skill identifies these gaps before solicitations are shared with potential Local Lead Organizations (LLOs).
Core Features & Use Cases
- Multi-dimensional quality scoring: Evaluates solicitations across 5 weighted dimensions (PDD fidelity, field completeness, deadline sanity, criteria alignment, and out-of-chain respondability) to produce a holistic quality rating.
- Critical issue flagging: Automatically detects hard blockers like unanswerable response template questions, past or >90 day deadlines, missing publish metadata, or criteria that don't reflect PDD requirements.
- Standardized output: Writes a consistent YAML verdict file that can be aggregated with other evaluation results for full opportunity quality tracking.
- Use case: A Connect opportunity team that has drafted and published a solicitation can run this eval to confirm the listing is faithful to the PDD, answerable by real LLOs, and ready for applicant review.
Quick Start
Run the solicitation-create-eval skill for the current Connect opportunity to generate a quality verdict for the published solicitation.