solid-principles

To check code for SOLID principle violations during a code review, evaluate classes and modules against the five principles to identify design flaws like bloated interfaces and tight coupling, ensuring maintainable architecture.

The best way to refactor a God class for clean architecture is to apply the Single Responsibility Principle to decouple components, enforcing strict dependency rules and interface segregation to resolve tight coupling and improve extensibility.

Interface segregation improves software design by forcing clients to depend only on the methods they actually use, which prevents bloated repository interfaces, reduces coupling, and directly enforces clean architecture rules within your modules.

Yes, you can use SOLID principles to verify if a new service implementation violates the Open-Closed Principle by analyzing whether the module structure requires modification rather than extension, ensuring the code remains maintainable as the project scales.

You should enforce strict dependency rules during software design refactoring when you need to resolve tight coupling and satisfy clean architecture requirements, ensuring that high-level modules do not depend on low-level implementations but rather on abstractions.

Applying the Dependency Inversion Principle helps with software maintainability by decoupling high-level components from low-level modules, enforcing strict dependency rules on abstractions, and making complex software systems significantly easier to test and extend.