solid-principles

To identify SOLID violations in a TypeScript codebase, review your modules, classes, and hooks against SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, and DIP guidelines. This process uses a structured checklist and concrete examples to detect coupling and architectural issues.

The best way to refactor for Interface Segregation violations is to apply targeted refactors that split bloated interfaces into smaller, specific ones. Using concrete before and after patterns ensures classes only implement the methods they actually need.

Liskov Substitution in TypeScript class design ensures subtypes can replace their base types without altering program correctness. Detecting LSP violations involves checking inheritance structures and applying concrete fix patterns to maintain behavioral compatibility.

Yes, you can use this SOLID review workflow for React hooks. The violation detection and fix patterns explicitly target modules, classes, and hooks, allowing you to enforce Single Responsibility and Dependency Inversion in your custom hooks.

You should enforce the Single Responsibility Principle during a code review when modules have multiple reasons to change. Applying SRP guidelines limits modification scope, reduces coupling, and increases overall code readability.

Common Dependency Inversion violations in TypeScript architecture occur when high-level modules directly depend on low-level modules rather than abstractions. Detecting these issues involves analyzing module coupling and applying targeted refactors to inject dependencies.