solid-principles

To check object-oriented code for SOLID design principle violations, you can audit the source file directly. This process analyzes the code against all five principles, identifies specific flaws, and provides severity ratings with refactoring suggestions to improve maintainability.

The best way to refactor a god object violating the Single Responsibility Principle is to run a targeted audit. This identifies specific SRP violations and provides concrete refactoring suggestions to split the class into smaller, maintainable components.

Yes, you can audit source code for just one specific SOLID principle instead of all five. The analysis supports targeted checks, allowing you to focus exclusively on Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, or Dependency Inversion.

An automated audit detects Liskov Substitution and Interface Segregation issues by analyzing the object-oriented source code structure. It identifies specific design flaws where subclasses break parent contracts or where classes are forced to implement unused methods.

The SOLID principles audit analyzes object-oriented source code regardless of the specific programming language. By evaluating the code structure against the five design principles, it provides actionable feedback and refactoring suggestions for any object-oriented codebase.

You should run a full SOLID design audit when assessing overall code quality and architecture, but use a targeted check when you suspect a specific issue like a god object. Both approaches yield severity ratings and refactoring suggestions for the identified violations.