Grades research claims on two axes using A-F and 1-6 scales.
npx skills add https://github.com/markusstrasser/skills --skill source-grading
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: source-grading Source: https://github.com/markusstrasser/skills/tree/main/source-grading Command: npx skills add https://github.com/markusstrasser/skills --skill source-grading
NATO Admiralty System for grading source reliability and information credibility. Apply automatically during OSINT, forensic investigations, legal research, entity audits, or fraud analysis — NOT for general software or casual research. Every claim gets a 2-axis grade (A-F for source reliability, 1-6 for information credibility).
Instruct an AI to assign an Axis 1 letter grade and an Axis 2 numeric grade to each claim and record the results.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
The NATO Admiralty system grades source reliability and information credibility using two independent axes. It assigns an A–F letter grade for source reliability and a 1–6 numeric grade for information credibility to formalize OSINT and forensic investigations.
To grade OSINT claims, assign an Axis 1 letter grade (A–F) for source reliability and an Axis 2 numeric grade (1–6) for information credibility. This two-axis grading quantifies claim credibility and establishes a formal audit trail.
Two-axis source grading is designed for formal OSINT, forensic investigations, legal research, and entity audits. It is not intended for general software audits or casual research, requiring documented judgment and provenance tagging.
Provenance tagging records the origin and audit trail of each claim alongside its A–F source reliability and 1–6 information credibility grades. This ensures documented judgment and reliable handoffs in complex investigation workflows.
Use formal two-axis grading when your OSINT, legal research, or fraud analysis requires documented judgment, provenance tagging, and audit trails. Casual source evaluation lacks the structured A–F and 1–6 scales needed for formal compliance.
The best way to document information credibility is applying a formal two-axis grading system. It assigns A–F source reliability and 1–6 information credibility grades, creating a quantifiable audit trail for legal research and forensic investigations.
ssmleoArchive primary-source evidence files with verified directory integrity and immutable history.
zm2231Evaluate credibility and bias of websites, articles, and publications.
lm93129Identify fraud risk red flags using the fraud triangle model.
Liberty91LTDApply NATO Admiralty Scale ratings to assess intelligence source reliability and credibility.
