source-synthesis

Extract themes, tensions, and convergences across multiple academic sources into a synthesis narrative.

1|Updated Jun 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RHuebner1972/doctoral-second-brain --skill source-synthesis-rhuebner1972
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: source-synthesis
Source: https://github.com/RHuebner1972/doctoral-second-brain/tree/main/skills/source-synthesis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RHuebner1972/doctoral-second-brain --skill source-synthesis-rhuebner1972

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Reading many papers individually leaves you with isolated summaries instead of an integrated argument. This Skill turns a collection of sources into a synthesized narrative that shows what the literature collectively establishes, where it disagrees, and what it cannot answer. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Per-Source Extraction: Pulls each source's core finding, methodology, population, key constructs, and stated limitations into a structured table. - Synthesis Matrix: Builds a comparative grid across all sources to surface convergence, divergence, evolution over time, and methodological patterns. - Draft Synthesis Paragraphs: Produces dissertation-ready prose linking the literature's collective foundation to the gap your study addresses. - Use Case: You have 12 articles on doctoral student persistence. Use this Skill to generate a synthesis matrix, identify that survey methods dominate the field, and draft a paragraph arguing that lived-experience perspectives remain unstudied. ## Quick Start Synthesize these attached articles into a comparison matrix and a draft synthesis paragraph for my literature review.

Frequently Asked Questions about source-synthesis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize multiple sources for a literature review?

Extract each source's core finding, method, population, and limitations, then build a comparison matrix to identify convergence, divergence, and gaps. Finish by writing a narrative that states what the literature collectively establishes and what it leaves unanswered.

What is the difference between summary and synthesis in academic writing?

Summary reports each source individually, while synthesis identifies what sources collectively say, where they conflict, and what they miss together. Synthesis connects findings across studies rather than listing them one by one.

How many sources do I need for a synthesis matrix?

A synthesis matrix works with any set of sources, but convergence claims typically require at least three sources agreeing on a finding. Larger sets reveal clearer methodological patterns and evolutionary trends in the literature.

Can this help identify research gaps from existing papers?

Yes. The process explicitly asks what question the combined sources cannot answer, then links that collective gap to your study with a statement of how the present research addresses it.

What are the limitations of synthesizing sources this way?

The output quality depends on the sources you provide and the accuracy of your per-source extractions. It does not replace systematic review protocols with formal inclusion criteria or quantitative meta-analysis.