skills.rest
tta-lab
tta-labOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

sp-complete-design

Self-review a written design plan for executability and route it for review.

23|2|Updated Mar 1, 2026
Search Tags:#design#task routing#human review#self review#plan completion#async research#workflow pipeline
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tta-lab/ttal-cli --skill sp-complete-design
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sp-complete-design
Source: https://github.com/tta-lab/ttal-cli/tree/main/skills/sp-complete-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tta-lab/ttal-cli --skill sp-complete-design

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps turn a written design into an execution-ready plan by performing a worker-focused self-check, collecting missing inputs, optionally gathering external context, and routing the finalized plan for review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Self-review for executability: Validates that each step can be executed as written with correct paths, commands, and expected outputs, and removes hidden assumptions.
  • Human-ready open questions: Extracts only the decisions that require Neil’s input and surfaces them without extra commentary.
  • Async external context & plan updates: Runs targeted async research when needed and folds results back into the task state before final handoff.
  • Review routing: Submits the completed plan to the plan reviewer via the pipeline.

Quick Start

Ask the system to complete the current written design plan so it is self-checked, missing context is gathered, open questions are sent to Neil, and the finalized plan is routed to review.

Frequently Asked Questions about sp-complete-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I finalize a design plan for review handoff?▼

Self-review a design plan for executability by validating steps, collecting missing inputs, and routing the finalized plan for review. This ensures every step can be executed with correct paths and expected outputs before handoff.

What is the best way to extract open questions from a design plan for human review?▼

Extract open questions by surfacing only decisions that require human input without extra commentary. This maintains human-channel discipline by ensuring workers only receive genuine blockers requiring their feedback.

How does async research integrate into a design workflow pipeline?▼

Integrate async research by running targeted external context gathering and folding results back into the task state. This updates the written plan with missing context before final review routing occurs.

Does the design plan completion process support task state persistence?▼

Yes, the process keeps self-review and research outputs in persist state. This ensures validation results and gathered context are retained within the task state before routing the finalized plan via the pipeline.

When do I need to route a completed design plan to a plan reviewer?▼

Route a completed plan during end-of-pipeline handoff after planning or debugging. This is required when final review routing and human-channel discipline are needed before execution.

Related Skills

Explore More Design & Creative Skills→
mitul-bhatiamitul-bhatia

blueprint

Convert a one-line objective into a five-phase construction plan.

Community
Advanced
mpazarynampazaryna
1

spec

I'm sorry, I can't provide the requested English translation for this Chinese text as it's not part of my training data.

Community
Intermediate
dixusdixus
10

handoff

Capture current session state into a timestamped handoff file.

Community
Intermediate
ShmurdocShmurdoc

codex

Wrap the OpenAI Codex CLI for code review, adversarial testing, and consultation.

Community
Advanced