sp-verification-before-completion

Run verification commands and inspect outputs before declaring task completion.

4|Updated Feb 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AlphaComposite/openclaw-superpowers-port --skill sp-verification-before-completion
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sp-verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/AlphaComposite/openclaw-superpowers-port/tree/main/skills/sp-verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlphaComposite/openclaw-superpowers-port --skill sp-verification-before-completion

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Gate work claims by requiring fresh verification evidence before any completion status is announced, preventing dishonesty and sloppy closures.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Verification gate: Enforces a step-by-step process (identify command, run full verification, read output, verify against criteria) before declaring completion.
  • Auditable evidence: Ensures outputs, exit codes, and logs are captured to support post-hoc validation.
  • Use Case: In a software project, use this skill to ensure a feature is only marked done after all tests pass and verification results are reviewed.

Quick Start

Run the verification command, review the results, and only then declare completion with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about sp-verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify task completion before claiming a feature is done?

A verification gate requires running the full verification command, inspecting its output, counting failures, and verifying against criteria before declaring completion. This ensures work claims are backed by auditable command results and outputs.

How do I enforce an auditable verification gate for software project sign-off?

An auditable verification gate enforces a step-by-step process to capture outputs, exit codes, and logs before announcing any completion status. This supports post-hoc validation by ensuring fresh evidence backs every sign-off.

What is the best way to prevent dishonest or sloppy task closures in automated workflows?

The best way to prevent sloppy closures is to gate work claims by requiring fresh verification evidence before any completion status is announced. This ensures outputs are reviewed and failures are counted before a task is marked done.

Can I use verification gates for any workflow requiring status or sign-off validation?

Yes, you can use verification gates for any workflow where status or sign-off must be backed by verifiable command results. The process applies universally to ensure completion claims are validated against actual output.

What steps are required to declare completion with verifiable evidence?

To declare completion with verifiable evidence, you must identify the verification command, run the full command, read its output, verify the results against your criteria, and only then make the completion claim with the captured evidence.