What problem does it solve?
Product teams frequently face subjective, unaccountable demand prioritization that leads to wasted engineering resources, missed business targets, and persistent stakeholder conflicts over what to build next. This skill eliminates guesswork by providing a structured, multi-model scoring framework that produces transparent, defensible prioritization decisions.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Multi-model scoring support: Evaluate demands using RICE, ICE, Kano, and cost-benefit analysis models, with automatic discrepancy marking between model results to surface conflicting priorities for team discussion.
- Calibrated roadmap generation: Output versioned roadmap plans (Now/Next/Later) aligned with team resource constraints, business goals, and hard deadlines, plus actionable recommendations for cutting low-value or harmful demands.
- Use case example: A product team with 15 competing feature requests and 3 available engineers for a 6-week cycle can use this skill to objectively rank demands, align stakeholders on a Q3 growth-focused roadmap, and clearly explain why certain features were prioritized or deferred.
Quick Start
Use the SPACE-prioritization-engine skill to rank the 12 feature requests collected from customer feedback last month, with 3 engineers available for the next 6 weeks and a Q3 target of 15% new user activation.