spec-architect

To translate vague feature ideas into auditable engineering specifications, use a structured Spec process that defines scope across requirements, architecture, and task planning. This enables stepwise approval and produces concrete artifacts for cross-team alignment.

Creating requirements, design, and task planning documents is best handled through a spec-driven workflow that generates phase-specific files like requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md. This ensures each stage remains traceable and reviewable before proceeding.

Stepwise approval in software architecture planning works by pausing after each phase to await user confirmation. The process generates phase-specific documents, stopping after requirements definition and architecture design so you can review before task breakdown begins.

Yes, you can use a spec-driven workflow to ensure cross-team understanding during feature implementation. It standardizes the flow from requirements to design to task breakdown, producing reviewable artifacts that maintain alignment across all teams involved.

To start generating structured specification documents for your software project, you need a vague feature idea to input. The process initiates Phase 1 to produce a requirements document and pauses, requiring your review before advancing to architecture and task planning phases.

You need phase-specific documents like requirements.md and design.md during development to provide auditable engineering documentation and a unified workflow. They prevent vague ideas from entering implementation without structured, traceable scope and architecture definitions.