spec-doc

To convert requirement summaries into developer-ready specs, you can use a structured transformation process that extracts background, user stories, and functional requirements into a review-ready Markdown document. This ensures engineering and product teams align on scope and implementation details.

Functional and non-functional requirements documentation should include background, user stories, system boundaries, assumptions, open issues, and verifiable acceptance criteria. Structuring these elements clearly ensures engineering and product teams can align on scope and implementation details.

You can generate Traditional Chinese user stories and acceptance criteria by applying a structured transformation to requirement summaries. This produces a localized specification document containing verifiable acceptance criteria, which is ideal for cross-team sprint planning and review.

Yes, writing specification documents in merge mode prevents overwriting existing content. It outputs to an on-disk Markdown file while preserving applicable existing text, ensuring safe integration during collaborative drafting and review workflows.

Yes, you can use a Clarify Agent summary or the first chapter of a design.md file as input for drafting a development requirements specification. The process transforms these informal requirement notes into a structured, review-ready document.

The best way to structure open issues and system boundaries in a development spec is to extract them into dedicated sections within a Markdown file. Separating these elements from functional requirements clarifies scope constraints and highlights unresolved questions for cross-team review.