spec-document

Transform RESEARCH.md into SPEC.md with requirements, interfaces, and traceability.

Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AndreaCadonna/Certificate_Authority_Service --skill spec-document
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: spec-document
Source: https://github.com/AndreaCadonna/Certificate_Authority_Service/tree/main/workflow/skills/spec-document
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AndreaCadonna/Certificate_Authority_Service --skill spec-document

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

SPEC.md documents typically lack a consistent format, making it hard to ensure all requirements, interfaces, behavior scenarios, and traceability are captured and verifiable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Standardized SPEC.md template that enforces a consistent structure for requirements, interfaces, and scenarios.
  • Traceability integration linking requirements to concrete behavior scenarios and test cases.
  • Guided workflow to transform RESEARCH.md into a precise, testable SPEC.md with clear acceptance criteria.

Quick Start

Run the specification workflow to generate a SPEC.md from RESEARCH.md with all requirements and scenarios.

Frequently Asked Questions about spec-document

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a standardized SPEC.md template with consistent requirements and traceability?

To create a standardized SPEC.md template, you need a structure that enforces mandatory frontmatter fields, groups requirements by interface, and links behavior scenarios to test cases via a traceability matrix. This ensures all specifications remain verifiable and consistently formatted.

What is the best way to transform research documentation into a precise, testable specification?

The best way to transform RESEARCH.md into a testable SPEC.md is through a guided generation workflow. This process codifies research into formal requirements, defines clear acceptance criteria, and maps behavior scenarios to ensure the resulting specification is fully testable.

How does traceability integration work when defining behavior scenarios in a SPEC.md document?

Traceability integration works by linking each documented requirement directly to concrete behavior scenarios and corresponding test cases within the SPEC.md. This matrix mapping ensures every specified requirement is verifiable and prevents untested or orphaned functionality.

Do I need mandatory frontmatter fields in my SPEC.md documents to ensure quality standards?

Yes, mandatory frontmatter fields are required to enforce quality standards in SPEC.md documents. These fields codify the document's format and structure, guaranteeing that all essential metadata, requirements, and interfaces are consistently captured for verification.

Can I use this specification workflow to generate testable acceptance criteria from existing requirements?

Yes, you can use this specification workflow to generate testable acceptance criteria from existing requirements. By transforming your raw requirements into a structured SPEC.md, the workflow enforces the creation of behavior scenarios and a traceability matrix for validation.

What are the limitations of using unstructured documentation for requirements and behavior scenarios?

Unstructured requirements documentation lacks consistent format and traceability integration, making it hard to ensure all behavior scenarios and interfaces are captured and verifiable. Without a standardized SPEC.md template, validating acceptance criteria becomes highly prone to gaps.