skills.rest
primatrix
primatrixOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

spec-document-reviewer

Evaluate RFC drafts for completeness, fact traceability, and internal consistency.

5|Updated Feb 4, 2026
Search Tags:#code quality#software design#fact verification#consistency checking#rfc review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/primatrix/skills --skill spec-document-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: spec-document-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/primatrix/skills/tree/main/plugins/beaver/skills/spec-document-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/primatrix/skills --skill spec-document-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps streamline the review process for RFC (Request for Comments) drafts by providing a structured review that checks for completeness, fact traceability, and internal consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review: Evaluates RFC drafts against five key dimensions to ensure comprehensive review.
  • Fact Traceability: Ensures all concrete facts in the draft have proper provenance.
  • Internal Consistency: Checks for contradictions within the document.
  • Testability: Validates the implementation plan for deliverable artifacts.
  • Use Case: Ideal for design teams to ensure RFC drafts are of high quality before pushing PRs.

Quick Start

Use the spec-document-reviewer skill to review the RFC draft titled 'Design Proposal for X'.

Frequently Asked Questions about spec-document-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review an RFC draft for completeness and consistency?▼

To review an RFC draft for completeness and consistency, apply a structured review process that evaluates fact traceability, internal contradictions, and implementation testability against project objectives.

What is fact traceability in software design RFCs?▼

Fact traceability in software design RFCs ensures all concrete facts and technical claims within the draft have proper provenance and verifiable origins, maintaining technical accuracy.

How do I check if an RFC implementation plan is testable?▼

You check if an RFC implementation plan is testable by validating the proposed deliverable artifacts against project objectives to ensure they are concrete and verifiable.

Can I use an automated RFC review process for design proposals?▼

Yes, you can use an automated RFC review process for design proposals to streamline feedback, checking for internal consistency and completeness before pushing code PRs.

What is the best way to ensure technical accuracy in an RFC document?▼

The best way to ensure technical accuracy in an RFC document is through fact verification and consistency checking across five key dimensions during a structured review.

Why does my RFC draft fail consistency checks before a PR?▼

Your RFC draft may fail consistency checks before a PR if it contains internal contradictions, lacks fact provenance, or has an implementation plan that fails testability validation.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
vecearvecear

rfc-generator

Generate RFC documents with standardized sections for proposals and reviews.

Community
Advanced
gittowergittower
413

handle-pr

Review GitHub pull requests end to end and draft review for approval.

Official
Advanced
VoDaiLoczVoDaiLocz
24

lint-and-validate

Automate linting and static analysis of code in CI pipelines.

Community
Intermediate
Chanw-researchChanw-research
38

ppw:reviewer-simulation

Generate structured bilingual peer-review feedback across five evaluation dimensions.

Official
Advanced