spec/edit

Specification edits without breaking cross-references require a 4-step workflow: load the spec, analyze impact, apply changes, and verify consistency. This process automatically traces ripple effects across architecture docs to prevent stale links.

Impact analysis in specification version-control is an automatic mapping step that identifies all downstream cross-reference changes before edits are committed. It enforces mandatory user approval to ensure no stale references slip into architecture docs.

To propagate changes across multiple PRD-like architecture docs, initiate a sequential edit session that loads the files, traces the impact across sections, applies the modifications, and runs a verification pass for documentation consistency.

Yes, the specification editing workflow requires explicit user approval before applying changes. Guardrails enforce a mandatory approval gate after impact analysis and before the apply step to ensure safe modifications to requirements.

A limitation of automatic impact tracking is its reliance on a strict 4-step micro-file architecture via references/step-XX files. Deviating from this load, impact, apply, and verify sequence breaks context preservation and cross-reference checks for requirements.