spec-interview

An exhaustive specification interview systematically reviews data models, architecture, security, and scope through iterative questioning to detect ambiguities and gaps in a spec file before implementation begins.

The best way to refine product requirements is conducting an iterative Q&A session with the spec author to meticulously review edge cases, error handling, and integration points, updating the spec until it requires no further clarification.

Yes, the specification interview process can read and edit the spec file iteratively, using bash commands and web searches to resolve missing details, ensuring the final document is complete enough for implementation without further clarification.

Yes, you can use this approach to review all technical aspects of a feature specification, as it systematically evaluates data models, architecture, behavior, integration, security, operations, and scope to ensure comprehensive coverage.

You need an iterative interview process for your documentation when a specification contains ambiguities or missing details, requiring multi-round Q&A to thoroughly resolve edge cases and error handling before development starts.

A limitation of using an automated interview is that it requires active participation from the spec author to answer detailed questions across multiple rounds, meaning it cannot independently invent missing domain logic or make product decisions on its own.