spec-kitty-mission-review

To verify spec-to-code fidelity after merging, you need an adversarial post-merge audit that maps each functional requirement to owning work packages, tests, and implementation diffs to detect drift and surface unstated risks before release.

An adversarial post-merge code audit for functional requirement traceability is a structured review process that analyzes merged code against its original specification, ensuring every requirement is backed by test evidence and checking for locked-decision violations or non-goal invasions.

To detect specification drift and security risks before tagging a release, analyze git diffs and event logs to identify boundary-condition risks, error-paths, dead code, and subprocess or path risks, then compile the findings into an evidence-backed report.

Yes, you can map functional requirements directly to git diffs and tests by reviewing merged work packages and event logs, producing a self-contained markdown report that cites specific git diffs to verify complete implementation of the specification.

The best way to generate an evidence-backed pass/fail verdict for a release gate is to perform a comprehensive cross-work-package integration check, enumerate all drift and risk findings with severity levels, and map them directly to functional requirements and test coverage.

You should not use a post-merge spec-to-code fidelity audit on incomplete missions, as the process requires all work packages to be marked done and fully merged to accurately analyze cross-work-package integration, trace functional requirements, and detect specification drift.