spec-review

Acceptance verification is automated by comparing implementation against proposal, design, and evidence. It applies to changes requiring formal verification before archive, enforcing guardrails and providing traceable evidence for the final decision.

A spec-review cycle for design validation is an independent acceptance gate. It cross-checks task completion against the original spec and execution evidence to ensure changes are verified before archiving.

Yes, Codex enforces guardrails during the archive process. It automates the final acceptance gate, ensuring the archive decision is made independently by comparing implementation against verification evidence.

You get a traceable audit trail for archive readiness by running the acceptance review process. It cross-checks execution evidence against the proposal and design, outputting a clear decision paper for verification.

Yes, the acceptance gate works without external dependencies. It independently compares implementation against proposal, design, tasks, and verification evidence to ensure archive readiness within its self-contained environment.

You need formal verification for task completion when changes require archiving across spec-review cycles. It ensures implementation is cross-checked against design and execution evidence before final acceptance.