spec-review

Automate multi-agent spec review by orchestrating a three-phase process with self-critique and cross-agent challenges to validate and harden architectural blueprints. The orchestration uses risk-based agent selection to ensure coverage across critical risk areas before producing a final structured assessment.

Cross-review routing in spec validation is an agent orchestration mechanism where expert agents challenge each other's assessments to surface and resolve disagreements. It ensures design documents or API specs are thoroughly hardened through structured cross-agent challenges before final synthesis.

Yes, review automation handles large or complex API specs by applying risk-based agent selection and phase-based orchestration. This approach ensures comprehensive coverage across risk areas, validating the spec through self-critique and cross-review to produce a structured synthesis with a final verdict.

Track risks during a phased design document review by orchestrating a multi-agent team with risk-based selection. The three-phase process validates the spec through self-critique and cross-review, deduplicating findings and maintaining traceability to produce a final verdict with structured synthesis.

You need a structured synthesis output for spec review when validating complex design documents or API specs through multi-agent orchestration. It deduplicates findings, maintains traceability across self-critique and cross-review phases, and delivers a final verdict to solidify the spec before implementation.

Yes, spec review orchestration works without external dependencies, relying entirely on its internal multi-agent design to execute the three-phase review. It spawns an agent team to handle self-critique, cross-agent challenges, and structured synthesis autonomously to harden the provided spec.