spec-workflow

To plan multi-module architecture changes, you can transform ambiguous requests into confirmed requirements, architecture design, and traceable tasks. This workflow generates requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md files to enforce disciplined planning and prevent rework before implementation.

Writing testable acceptance criteria for ambiguous requests requires restating scope and defining boundaries using EARS format. This workflow generates user stories and testable acceptance criteria in requirements.md to clarify fuzzy project boundaries and align stakeholders.

To break down complex software design decisions into tasks, you must clarify module boundaries, technical choices, and security notes first. This workflow maps architecture-first design decisions into reviewable implementation tasks that trace directly back to confirmed requirements.

Yes, this spec workflow explicitly supports projects with missing or fuzzy acceptance criteria. It applies to medium-to-large ambiguous change requests, restating scope and enforcing confirmation before execution to satisfy disciplined planning requirements.

You need an architecture-first workflow when coordinating multi-module features like new pages, UI redesigns, or database changes. It clarifies technical choices, module boundaries, and supporting data/API notes to align stakeholders step-by-step before code execution.

Yes, you can enforce stakeholder confirmation before execution in multi-module projects. The workflow produces requirements, design, and task plans, requiring explicit confirmation to satisfy disciplined planning requirements and prevent costly rework.