What problem does it solve? Writing a Chinese patent specification (background, invention content, embodiments, figure descriptions, abstract) that stays consistent with the claims and the invention disclosure is error-prone: facts get overstated, figure references get missed, and sections drift apart. This Skill enforces disciplined drafting rules and assembles everything into a single structured draft.md file. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Section-by-section drafting rules: Covers background art, invention content (problem/solution/effects), detailed embodiments, figure descriptions, and abstract, with utility-model title variants handled automatically. - Fact-grading discipline: Maps A/B/C evidence levels from the intake audit to calibrated wording (e.g., tested data vs. design targets), preserving disclosed numeric values with proper qualifiers. - Five-anchor consistency check: Cross-reads abstract, background, technical problem, independent claim, and main effect to verify problem-feature-effect alignment before finalizing. - Use Case: After claims are finalized in a patent drafting workflow, invoke this stage to write the full specification and abstract, then compile case header, review notes, abstract, claims, and specification into one draft.md ready for the build step. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to proceed to stage three of the patent drafting workflow to write the specification and abstract and assemble the complete draft.md from the finalized claims.
