speckit.checker

Run static analysis tools and aggregate results into a prioritized issue report.

Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/prof-danielc/SpaceScream --skill speckit-checker-prof-danielc
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: speckit.checker
Source: https://github.com/prof-danielc/SpaceScream/tree/main/.agent/skills/speckit.checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/prof-danielc/SpaceScream --skill speckit-checker-prof-danielc

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of running static analysis tools on code projects, providing a comprehensive and prioritized report of issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Static Code Analysis: Runs a suite of static analysis tools to identify security vulnerabilities, type errors, and style issues.
  • Aggregated Report: Consolidates the results from multiple tools into a single, prioritized report.
  • Use Case: Ideal for software development teams looking to automate the code review process and maintain code quality.

Quick Start

Run the speckit.checker skill on your project directory to get a static analysis report.

Frequently Asked Questions about speckit.checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate static code analysis for multiple linters and scanners?

Static code analysis works by running a suite of configured linters, type checkers, and security scanners, then consolidating their outputs into a single prioritized report. This approach identifies security vulnerabilities, type errors, and style issues across any codebase.

Can I consolidate linting and type checking results into a unified report?

Consolidating linting and type checking results into a unified report aggregates outputs from multiple tools into a single prioritized list. This eliminates manual review of separate linter and type checker outputs, streamlining the code review process.

Do I need specific linters and security scanners installed to run automated code quality checks?

Running automated code quality checks requires various linters, type checkers, and security scanners installed in your environment. The automation executes these existing tools and aggregates their results, rather than providing built-in scanning engines.

What's the best way to generate a prioritized report of code vulnerabilities and type errors?

Generating a prioritized report of code vulnerabilities and type errors is best achieved by automating static code analysis. Running a suite of security scanners and type checkers aggregates findings into one comprehensive report, maintaining code quality without manual inspection.

When should I not use automated static analysis for code review?

Automated static analysis is not suitable when your environment lacks the required linters, type checkers, or security scanners installed. It is also less applicable if a project does not require automated code quality checks or lacks a compatible codebase structure.