speckit-micro-fix

Document evidence-backed micro-fixes for spec-kit regressions with scoped validation.

95|39|Updated Dec 15, 2025

Search Tags:#workflow #root cause #validation #spec-kit #bugfix #acceptance

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/liuminxin45/auto-podcast --skill speckit-micro-fix

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: speckit-micro-fix
Source: https://github.com/liuminxin45/auto-podcast/tree/main/.agents/spec-kit/skills/speckit-micro-fix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/liuminxin45/auto-podcast --skill speckit-micro-fix

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you handle small, locally verifiable bug fixes with a compact evidence trail instead of a heavy planning process.

Core Features & Use Cases

Evidence-driven triage: Capture the symptom, call path, root-cause evidence, and excluded alternatives before changing code.
Scoped change control: Define exactly which files and behaviors are allowed to change, keeping the fix narrowly contained.
Validation and acceptance: Record the minimal checks, expected outcomes, and a user-facing acceptance-lite checklist for quick review.
Use case: A developer finds a small regression in a spec-kit project, confirms it locally, and uses this Skill to document the micro-fix path from diagnosis through acceptance.

Quick Start

Use this skill to document a small evidence-backed bug fix, define the allowed scope, and record the validation steps and acceptance checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about speckit-micro-fix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I document a small bugfix with root cause evidence in spec-kit projects?▼

Document a small bugfix by recording the symptom, call path, root-cause evidence, and excluded alternatives before changing code. This evidence-driven triage captures the micro-fix path from diagnosis through acceptance in spec-kit projects.

What is the best way to validate a narrowly scoped regression locally without full planning?▼

Validate a narrowly scoped regression by recording minimal checks, expected outcomes, and a user-facing acceptance-lite checklist. This lightweight bugfix workflow avoids heavy planning while ensuring quick review for locally verifiable fixes.

When should I use a lightweight bugfix workflow instead of full planning and research?▼

Use a lightweight bugfix workflow for small, evidence-backed issues that can be verified locally and resolved without expanding into full planning or research. It suits narrowly scoped regressions requiring concise root-cause records and minimal validation.

Does the acceptance-lite checklist require heavy validation steps for small code changes?▼

No, the acceptance-lite checklist requires only minimal validation steps and expected outcomes for quick review. It is designed for small code changes in spec-kit projects, avoiding the heavy validation overhead of full acceptance processes.