speckit.quizme

Spec analysis uses Socratic red-teaming to challenge assumptions, detect happy-path bias, and surface failure modes in requirements. It generates concrete, plausible edge-case scenarios to test the resilience and robustness of your specifications.

You can analyze spec.md and plan.md by applying structured critique to surface hidden assumptions and timing issues. This yields actionable edge-case scenarios and refinement requirements to append directly to your specification documentation.

Socratic red-teaming is a spec analysis technique that proactively questions and challenges logical gaps in requirements. It interrogates assumptions to generate concrete failure scenarios and robust refinement requirements for your specification documentation.

You generate actionable edge-case scenarios by applying interactive Socratic critique to your specifications. This guides iterative spec updates, capturing new edge cases and potential failure modes as they are discovered during the analysis.

Spec analysis hardens existing specifications by applying interactive critique to current spec and plan documents. It iteratively captures newly discovered edge cases and updates the existing requirements documentation to improve overall robustness.