speckit-review-tests

Analyze PR changes to identify test coverage gaps and resilience risks.

9|4|Updated May 13, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcp --skill speckit-review-tests
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: speckit-review-tests
Source: https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/tree/main/.agents/skills/speckit-review-tests
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcp --skill speckit-review-tests

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Identifies and analyzes gaps in test coverage during code review, focusing on behavioral coverage and resilience to regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Behavioral coverage assessment across PR changes to surface critical gaps.
  • Propose recommendations to improve test suites and resilience against changes.
  • Integrates with spec-kit project structure to guide reviews and ensure consistent standards.

Quick Start

Provide an actionable PR test-review plan that identifies critical gaps and suggests concrete test cases.

Frequently Asked Questions about speckit-review-tests

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify gaps in test coverage during a PR review?

Identifying test coverage gaps during a PR review involves analyzing PR changes to surface critical gaps in behavioral coverage and resilience, validating that tests exercise failure modes, edge cases, and concurrency.

What is behavioral coverage assessment in software testing?

Behavioral coverage assessment is the process of analyzing PR changes to validate that test suites exercise failure modes, edge cases, and concurrency risks, ensuring resilience against regressions rather than simply executing code paths.

How do I ensure my test suite covers negative cases and edge cases?

To ensure test suites cover negative cases and edge cases, you analyze PR changes to validate that tests explicitly exercise failure modes and resilience risks, generating structured recommendations for missing critical paths.

Does PR test coverage analysis work with a spec-kit project structure?

Yes, PR test coverage analysis integrates specifically with a spec-kit project structure and PR workflows to guide reviews, applying consistent standards to assess behavioral coverage and identify critical gaps.

What is the best way to find missing critical paths in my test suite?

The best way to find missing critical paths is to analyze PR changes for resilience risks and coverage gaps, validating that tests exercise failure modes and concurrency to output actionable structured recommendations.

When should I not rely solely on automated test coverage metrics?

You should look beyond automated metrics when resilience to regressions is critical, using behavioral coverage analysis to validate that tests actually exercise failure modes, edge cases, and concurrency risks in PR changes.