skills.rest
compnew2006
compnew2006COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

speckit.reviewer

Review Git diffs and output a severity-based feedback report.

63|13|Updated Jan 24, 2026
Search Tags:#git#security#maintainability#quality#static-analysis#code-review#review-feedback
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills --skill speckit-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: speckit.reviewer
Source: https://github.com/compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills/tree/main/skills/speckit.reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/compnew2006/Spec-Kit-Antigravity-Skills --skill speckit-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code reviews are often time-consuming and inconsistently applied; this Skill provides a structured, repeatable approach to producing actionable feedback that improves code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scope-aware review: analyzes changed files, staged changes, or branch diffs within a Git workflow.
  • Comprehensive checks: correctness, security, performance, maintainability, best practices, and style.
  • Structured output: generates a clear, severity-based feedback report with concrete fixes.
  • Use Case: integrate into PR reviews to automatically surface critical issues and suggested improvements.

Quick Start

Review the touched files and generate a structured feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about speckit.reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews for staged changes and Git branch diffs?▼

Automate code reviews by analyzing staged changes or branch diffs to generate a structured feedback report. This process evaluates correctness, security, performance, and maintainability to surface concrete fixes.

What is static analysis for code maintainability and security in a Git workflow?▼

Static analysis for code maintainability and security automatically inspects changed files within a Git workflow to identify vulnerabilities and best practice violations, producing a severity-based review report.

How do I generate a severity-based review feedback report for a pull request?▼

Generate a severity-based review feedback report by applying comprehensive checks to touched files. This outputs structured, actionable feedback highlighting critical issues and suggested improvements for pull requests.

Does this code review tool check for correctness, performance, and style simultaneously?▼

Yes, this code review tool checks for correctness, security, performance, maintainability, best practices, and style simultaneously. It analyzes your Git changes to deliver comprehensive, structured review feedback.

Can I use automated review feedback for branch diffs instead of full repository scans?▼

Yes, you can use automated review feedback for branch diffs. The review scope targets only changed files, staged changes, or branch diffs within Git workflows, preventing unnecessary full repository scans.

What is the best way to surface critical issues during pull request reviews?▼

The best way to surface critical issues is integrating scope-aware code reviews into pull request workflows. This automatically analyzes branch diffs and outputs a structured, severity-based report with actionable fixes.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
Utchash007Utchash007

commit

Stage git changes and generate conventional commit messages with confirmation.

Community
Advanced
jhlee0409jhlee0409
7

afc:pr-comment

Post severity-categorized review comments to GitHub Pull Requests.

Community
Advanced
j-showj-show

review-helper

Review git diffs, apply fixes, and verify with pnpm check and test commands.

Official
Advanced
inbharataiinbharatai
22

code-reviewer

Analyzes code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and style violations.

Community
Advanced