spectra-discuss

Guide one-question-at-a-time discussions to reach documented conclusions.

45|3|Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter --skill spectra-discuss-yudefine
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: spectra-discuss
Source: https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter/tree/main/.claude/skills/spectra-discuss
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/YuDefine/nuxt-supabase-starter --skill spectra-discuss-yudefine

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill enables focused, convergent discussions to reach clear conclusions, reducing ambiguity and guiding teams toward actionable outcomes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Guided discussion mode that enforces one-question-at-a-time exploration and structured decision-making.
  • Supports capture and tagging of decisions and artifacts (like design notes and proposals) to feed OpenSpec-style workflows.
  • Use Case: When evaluating architecture choices or process changes, teams can converge on a recommended path with documented reasoning.

Quick Start

Begin a discuss session by issuing /spectra:discuss <topic> to start a focused, goal-oriented conversation.

Frequently Asked Questions about spectra-discuss

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I facilitate structured decision-making for architecture choices?

Facilitate structured decision-making by guiding teams through one-question-at-a-time exploration, option comparison, and concrete outcomes to reach a clear conclusion. This enforces discussion guardrails and prevents implementation actions while promoting documentation.

What is the best way to run convergent discussions on design questions?

Run convergent discussions on design questions by enforcing one-question-at-a-time exploration and structured decision-making. This approach reduces ambiguity and guides teams toward actionable, documented outcomes with clear reasoning.

Can I capture and tag architecture decisions to feed OpenSpec workflows?

Yes, you can capture and tag decisions and artifacts like design notes and proposals during discussions to feed OpenSpec-style workflows. This supports discovery of OpenSpec artifacts and promotes documentation of the recommended path.

How do I start a focused discussion session to reach a conclusion?

Start a focused discussion session by issuing a command with your topic to begin a goal-oriented conversation. The session guides users through structured exploration, option comparison, and concrete outcomes to reach a clear conclusion.

Does this discussion facilitation approach enforce guardrails against implementation actions?

Yes, this discussion facilitation approach enforces discussion guardrails and explicitly prevents implementation actions. It focuses solely on convergent discussions, option comparison, and promoting documentation rather than executing changes.

When do I need structured facilitation for convergent discussions?

You need structured facilitation for convergent discussions when evaluating architecture choices or process changes and teams must converge on a recommended path with documented reasoning. It reduces ambiguity and guides teams toward actionable outcomes.