spike-evaluation

Guide bounded spike experiments to evaluate technical approach feasibility.

Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lilmuckers/agentic-team-plugin --skill spike-evaluation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: spike-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/lilmuckers/agentic-team-plugin/tree/main/skills/spike-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lilmuckers/agentic-team-plugin --skill spike-evaluation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Run bounded spike work to test feasibility before committing to a normal implementation path. Use when Spec wants Builder to try an idea, library, integration, or technical approach and report back against explicit success and failure criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Bounded, time-boxed experimentation to validate viability of a chosen approach.
  • Structured reporting that itemizes what was attempted, what succeeded, what failed, constraints, and recommended next steps.
  • Clear ownership and decision routing when spike outcomes determine the future implementation path.

Quick Start

Initiate a spike on evaluating a new library or integration and report results against predefined success and failure criteria.

Frequently Asked Questions about spike-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate the feasibility of a new library or integration before full implementation?

Evaluate technical feasibility by running bounded spike experiments that test a chosen approach against predefined success and failure criteria. This process structures your experimentation to validate viability quickly before committing to a normal implementation path.

What is a bounded spike and when do I need to run one?

A bounded spike is a time-boxed experimentation process used to test the viability of a new technical approach. You need to run one when you want to validate an idea, library, or integration and report back against explicit success and failure criteria.

How do I structure reporting for a technical spike experiment?

Structure spike reporting by itemizing what was attempted, what succeeded, what failed, discovered constraints, and recommended next steps. This structured reporting ensures clear ownership and decision routing when spike outcomes determine the future implementation path.

How do I define success and failure criteria for a feasibility spike?

Define success and failure criteria explicitly before initiating a time-boxed spike to test an idea or integration. Applying these predefined metrics ensures your structured reporting objectively validates whether the technical approach is viable.

Can I use a time-boxed spike to test an unfamiliar technical approach?

Yes, you can use time-boxed spikes to test unfamiliar technical approaches by guiding bounded experimentation. This method ensures you evaluate viability quickly and route implementation decisions based on structured reporting of explicit outcomes.

What are the limitations of using bounded spikes for technical decision-making?

Bounded spikes are limited to quick feasibility evaluation rather than full implementation. They require explicit ownership and predefined scope to prevent unbounded experimentation, ensuring outcomes only guide the future implementation path rather than deliver final features.