split

Simulate debates among famous personalities to analyze artifacts and synthesize actionable insights.

5|1|Updated Feb 8, 2026

Search Tags:#feedback #analysis #synthesis #debate #opinion #personalities

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/kamens/split-plugin --skill split

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: split
Source: https://github.com/kamens/split-plugin/tree/main/plugins/split/skills/split
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kamens/split-plugin --skill split

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you gain diverse perspectives on your work by simulating debates between famous, opinionated personalities, leading to a synthesized, actionable outcome.

Core Features & Use Cases

Multi-Perspective Analysis: Get feedback from 3-5 distinct, well-researched personalities.
Conflict Identification: Highlights disagreements between personalities for deeper insight.
Synthesized Outcomes: Delivers a concise summary and prioritized actions based on the debate.
Use Case: Submit a draft blog post and have personalities like a renowned editor, a marketing guru, and a contrarian strategist debate its merits, culminating in a refined piece.

Quick Start

Use the split skill to have puzzle experts review my prompt for creating crossword clues.

Frequently Asked Questions about split

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I get diverse feedback on my draft from multiple perspectives?▼

Simulating a debate among famous personalities provides diverse feedback on your drafts. The tool identifies key tensions between 3-5 distinct viewpoints, facilitates a debate round, and synthesizes the conflicting opinions into actionable insights.

Can I analyze different artifact types like URLs and file paths for opinion synthesis?▼

Opinion synthesis handles various artifact types including text, URLs, and file paths. It uses robust natural language understanding to process the input artifacts and orchestrate multiple agents to debate the content's merits.

What is the best way to resolve conflicting opinions during content analysis?▼

Resolving conflicting opinions during content analysis is best handled by simulating a debate among opinionated personalities. The tool highlights disagreements between viewpoints and synthesizes the debate into a concise summary with prioritized actions.

How to synthesize actionable insights from multi-perspective debate feedback?▼

To synthesize actionable insights from multi-perspective debate feedback, the tool processes the conflicting arguments and generates a refined outcome. It delivers a concise summary and prioritized actions based on the resolved tensions.

Does multi-perspective analysis work without prior knowledge of the personalities?▼

Multi-perspective analysis works without prior knowledge of the personalities because the tool automatically selects and simulates 3-5 well-researched figures. It orchestrates the agents to debate your artifact and identify key tensions independently.

Why use a simulated debate for artifact review instead of standard analysis?▼

A simulated debate for artifact review surfaces key tensions that standard analysis might miss. By forcing distinct personalities to debate merits and conflicts, it produces a synthesized outcome with deeper, more actionable insights.