skills.rest
picassio
picassioCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

squad-code-review

Review source code with two-pass correctness and complexity assessment.

48|3|Updated Mar 29, 2026
Search Tags:#code review#software quality#complexity assessment#structured feedback#two-pass review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/picassio/pi-squad --skill squad-code-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: squad-code-review
Source: https://github.com/picassio/pi-squad/tree/main/src/skills/squad-code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/picassio/pi-squad --skill squad-code-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill facilitates efficient code reviews by providing a two-pass review methodology that helps maintain code correctness, scope, and complexity, leading to cleaner, maintainable code.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-Pass Review Process: Ensures code correctness and minimizes scope violations during the first pass and identifies complexity issues in the second pass.
  • Surgical-Change Discipline: Focuses on necessary changes and avoids unnecessary ones.
  • Machine-Parsed Verdicts: Standardizes the review feedback for automation and consistency.
  • Use Case: Ideal for reviewing diffs, pull requests, or any code changes, especially in projects where maintainability and performance are critical.

Quick Start

Run 'squad code-review -p <pull_request_id>' to review the specified pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about squad-code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for pull requests?▼

You can automate code review for pull requests by running a structured two-pass process that verifies correctness and scope first, then assesses complexity, generating machine-parsable feedback for consistency.

What is a two-pass code review methodology?▼

A two-pass code review methodology first checks code correctness and minimizes scope violations, then identifies complexity issues in the second pass to ensure cleaner and more maintainable source code.

How do I generate machine-parsable code review feedback?▼

To generate machine-parsable code review feedback, run the review process against a pull request context; it standardizes verdicts on correctness, scope, and complexity for automated downstream consumption.

Can I review code diffs without a full pull request context?▼

No, reviewing code diffs requires a pull request context for analysis. The review process depends on this context to accurately assess correctness, scope, and complexity.

How do I prevent scope creep during code reviews?▼

To prevent scope creep during code reviews, apply a surgical-change discipline that focuses only on necessary modifications, enforced during the first pass of the structured review process.

What is the best way to assess code complexity in pull requests?▼

The best way to assess code complexity in pull requests is using a structured second-pass review that identifies complexity issues after initial correctness and scope verification are complete.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
HillBombCreationsHillBombCreations

cmd-reviewer

Automate code review analysis across local changes, branches, and pull request diffs.

Official
Advanced
HomericIntelligenceHomericIntelligence
18

verify-pr-ready

Validate GitHub Pull Requests for CI status, approvals, and merge conflicts.

Official
Intermediate
NoobyGainsNoobyGains
78

quality-enforcement

Enforce code quality standards across pre-commit, pre-merge, and CI pipeline stages.

Community
Advanced
baphledbaphled
1

static-analysis

Guide static code analysis tools to detect bugs, vulnerabilities, and style violations.

Community
Intermediate