stacks-design-taste-codex

Enforce deterministic design rules for Stacks.js frontend layouts.

2|Updated Jul 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stacksjs/status --skill stacks-design-taste-codex
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: stacks-design-taste-codex
Source: https://github.com/stacksjs/status/tree/main/.claude/skills/stacks-design-taste-codex
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stacksjs/status --skill stacks-design-taste-codex

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Generic AI-generated frontends suffer from severe layout biases, repetitive generic structures, invisible button text, dead bento grid cells, and cheap meta-labels that fail to meet premium brand standards. This Skill eliminates those issues by enforcing strict, deterministic design rules tailored for high-end Stacks frontend work, including landing pages, portfolios, and marketing sections.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Strict AIDA Page Structure: Enforces Attention (hero), Interest (gapless bento grid), Desire (scroll-driven motion sections), and Action (high-contrast CTA) structure for all marketing and editorial pages.
  • Deterministic Layout Variance: Uses seeded server-side selection to avoid repetitive generic layouts, ensuring every brief renders a unique, composed design without random client-side flicker.
  • Zero External Motion Libraries: All scroll-driven animations use pure CSS view()/scroll() timelines and Stacks composables, with no imports of GSAP, Framer Motion, or other external libraries.
  • Use Case: A SaaS team building a public landing page can use this Skill to guarantee a non-generic, award-worthy design with proper hero line limits, gapless bento grids, WCAG-compliant CTAs, and performant scroll animations, avoiding the common pitfalls of AI-generated frontend code.

Quick Start

Use the stacks-design-taste-codex skill to generate a premium landing page for your SaaS product with enforced AIDA structure, gapless bento grids, and deterministic scroll-driven motion, following all strict anti-slop design rules.

Frequently Asked Questions about stacks-design-taste-codex

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stop AI from generating generic, sloppy frontend layouts?

To stop AI from generating generic, sloppy frontend layouts, apply strict deterministic design rules that enforce AIDA structure, gapless CSS Grid bento layouts, and ban common AI slop patterns like cheap meta-labels and invisible button text for high-end output.

Can I build scroll-driven animations in Stacks without external JavaScript libraries?

Yes, you can build scroll-driven animations in Stacks without external JavaScript libraries by using pure CSS view() and scroll() timelines alongside Stacks composables, completely avoiding imports of GSAP or Framer Motion.

What is the AIDA structure for frontend landing pages?

The AIDA structure for frontend landing pages is a strict marketing composition enforcing Attention via the hero, Interest through a gapless bento grid, Desire with scroll-driven motion sections, and Action through a high-contrast CTA.

How do I prevent repetitive layouts across multiple AI-generated marketing pages?

Prevent repetitive layouts across multiple AI-generated marketing pages by using seeded server-side selection for deterministic layout variance, ensuring every brief renders a unique composed design without random client-side flicker.

Does this design engineering approach support WCAG-compliant contrast for CTAs?

Yes, this design engineering approach supports WCAG-compliant contrast by strictly enforcing high-contrast CTA structures and banning invisible button text to guarantee accessible, premium frontend outputs.

Why does my AI-generated bento grid have dead cells and poor structure?

AI-generated bento grids have dead cells and poor structure because of severe layout biases in generic output, which requires enforcing strict gapless CSS Grid rules and deterministic layout variance to resolve.