stacks-review

Analyze Stacks framework diffs for security, correctness, and compliance issues.

2|Updated Jul 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bughq/bughq --skill stacks-review-bughq
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: stacks-review
Source: https://github.com/bughq/bughq/tree/main/.claude/skills/stacks-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bughq/bughq --skill stacks-review-bughq

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires bun.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the inconsistency and oversight common in manual code reviews by providing a structured, two-pass audit that enforces security, correctness, and framework-specific best practices.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Critical Issue Detection: Automatically flags security vulnerabilities, race conditions, and framework-specific misconfigurations.
  • Test Coverage Audit: Maps changed functions to existing tests to identify gaps in coverage.
  • Mechanical Auto-Fixing: Safely applies formatting and simple type corrections while leaving architectural decisions to the developer.

Quick Start

Invoke the stacks-review skill to perform a comprehensive two-pass code review on your current staged changes.

Frequently Asked Questions about stacks-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a TypeScript monorepo?

You can automate code review for a TypeScript monorepo by running a structured two-pass audit that analyzes diffs for security vulnerabilities, correctness issues, and framework-specific compliance. It also evaluates test coverage gaps and applies mechanical auto-fixes.

What is a two-pass code review and how does it work?

A two-pass code review systematically analyzes staged diffs to enforce security, correctness, and framework-specific best practices. The first pass flags critical issues like vulnerabilities and race conditions, while the second evaluates test coverage gaps and applies safe mechanical formatting corrections.

Do I need Bun installed to run automated TypeScript code reviews?

Yes, Bun is required to run automated TypeScript code reviews. The process requires integration with Bun to execute static analysis and test audits across the monorepo, ensuring changed functions are mapped to existing tests.

Can automated code review detect security vulnerabilities and race conditions?

Yes, automated code review can detect security vulnerabilities and race conditions. The review automatically flags these critical issues alongside framework-specific misconfigurations during the initial diff analysis pass to prevent oversight common in manual reviews.

Will an automated code review fix my TypeScript type errors automatically?

An automated code review will safely apply mechanical auto-fixes for formatting and simple type errors. However, it leaves architectural decisions and complex logic corrections entirely to the developer to ensure safe code modifications.

When should I avoid using automated code review for my staged changes?

You should avoid using automated code review when architectural decisions or complex logic changes require human judgment, as the review only provides mechanical auto-fixes for formatting and type errors while flagging issues for the developer to resolve.