stage5-final-remarks

Consolidating reviewer feedback into a final rebuttal document is done by filling a final remarks template with condensed reviewer summaries and optional rating changes. This produces a polished, ready-to-submit markdown aligned with post-discussion workflows.

Generating final remarks for a peer-review rebuttal involves merging multi-reviewer condensed feedback and any rating updates into a structured template. The output is a complete markdown document preserving section order and satisfying reviewer expectations.

Yes, you can include rating changes when filling a final remarks template. The process reflects explicit rating updates provided alongside condensed reviewer summaries, ensuring the final markdown accurately documents any adjustments made during post-discussion workflows.

Yes, the template filling process preserves placeholders until grounded content is provided. This ensures the final remarks markdown maintains its required structure and section order without generating ungrounded or fabricated responses for missing reviewer summaries.

You need a final remarks template during post-discussion workflows when consolidating feedback from multiple reviewers into a single polished final document. It is applied after Stage3 and Stage4 discussions to produce a submission-ready academic rebuttal markdown.

The limitation is that the process only reflects explicit rating changes if provided and preserves placeholders until grounded content is supplied. It cannot fabricate reviewer responses or alter the predetermined template structure and section order during consolidation.