standard-review

Validate Chinese standardization documents against GB/T 1.1-2020 drafting requirements.

12|2|Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua --skill standard-review-jin-bo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: standard-review
Source: https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua/tree/main/examples/personas/Yvonne/skills/standard-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jin-bo/chahua --skill standard-review-jin-bo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Manually verifying if Chinese standardization documents (national, industry, local, group, and enterprise standards) comply with GB/T 1.1-2020 structural and drafting rules is time-consuming and prone to human error, especially for drafting teams and compliance officers who need to ensure documents meet regulatory requirements before submission or publication.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Full Compliance Auditing: Performs comprehensive checks covering structure completeness, element order, clause type correctness, modal verb usage, formatting specifications, and chart/form standards per GB/T 1.1-2020.
  • Flexible Review Depths: Supports quick review for structure checks, standard review for core clause and element validation, and deep review for full formatting and content compliance.
  • Structured Report Generation: Produces detailed review reports with severity-classified issues, specific modification suggestions, and overall compliance ratings to streamline document revision.
  • Use Case: A standard drafting team can use this skill to audit a draft national standard document before submission to the standardization administration, avoiding rejection due to non-compliance with drafting rules.

Quick Start

Use the standard-review skill to perform a full compliance audit of the attached draft standard document 'Q-XB-2024-001.docx' and generate a detailed review report with modification suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about standard-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if a Chinese standard document complies with GB/T 1.1-2020 drafting rules?

To check Chinese standard document compliance with GB/T 1.1-2020 drafting rules, you can audit the file for structure completeness, element order, and modal verb usage. This process validates national, industry, local, group, and enterprise standards to ensure they meet regulatory requirements before submission.

Can I audit a draft group standard in PDF format for structural completeness?

Yes, you can audit a draft group standard in PDF format for structural completeness. The compliance check supports .doc, .docx, .md, and .pdf formats, validating element order, clause type correctness, and formatting specifications according to GB/T 1.1-2020 requirements.

What is included in a GB/T 1.1-2020 compliance review report?

A GB/T 1.1-2020 compliance review report includes severity-classified issues, specific modification suggestions, and overall compliance ratings. It identifies problems with structure completeness, clause types, modal verb usage, and formatting to streamline document revision workflows.

How do I perform a quick structure check versus a deep formatting review for standardization documents?

To perform a quick structure check versus a deep formatting review for standardization documents, you can select different review depths. Quick review covers structure checks, standard review validates core clauses, and deep review checks full formatting and content compliance per GB/T 1.1-2020.

Why does my national standard draft fail the GB/T 1.1-2020 clause validation?

Your national standard draft may fail GB/T 1.1-2020 clause validation due to incorrect element order, improper modal verb usage, or incomplete structure. The compliance audit identifies these specific clause type correctness issues and provides actionable modification suggestions to fix them.