standards-lens

Review project code and documentation for standards and conventions adherence.

30|1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator --skill standards-lens
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: standards-lens
Source: https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator/tree/main/skills/review/lenses/standards-lens
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/atomicinnovation/accelerator --skill standards-lens

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps reviewers and orchestrators detect inconsistencies and omissions in project conventions, API semantics, and accessibility considerations so that changes remain predictable, navigable, and maintainable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluate Project Conventions: Check naming conventions, file organization, import/export patterns, and configuration management for consistency with existing code.
  • Assess API and Web Standards: Verify RESTful resource naming, HTTP method semantics, status codes, error response formats, versioning, CORS, pagination, and cacheability.
  • Accessibility & Change Management: Surface WCAG-relevant issues for UI changes, flag potential breaking changes and missing changelog entries, infer undocumented conventions and rate confidence for each finding.
  • Use Case: Run as part of a review orchestration pipeline to generate a focused standards compliance report for a plan, PR, or code diff.

Quick Start

Run the standards-lens on a plan or code diff to receive a concise standards-focused review summary.

Frequently Asked Questions about standards-lens

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check my codebase for accessibility and API standards compliance?

Reviewing code for conventions involves checking naming, file organization, and import patterns against existing project standards. The review rates confidence on inferred undocumented conventions and flags potential breaking changes or missing changelog entries.

Can I verify HTTP semantics and RESTful resource naming in a PR review?

Yes, you can verify HTTP semantics and RESTful resource naming during a PR review. The review assesses HTTP method semantics, status codes, error response formats, versioning, CORS, pagination, and cacheability to ensure changes remain predictable and maintainable.

What is the best way to evaluate UI changes for WCAG considerations?

Running standards compliance checks as part of a review orchestration pipeline generates a concise summary for a plan, PR, or code diff. This pipeline integration detects inconsistencies in project conventions, API semantics, and accessibility considerations.

Does this standards review tool infer undocumented project conventions?

Yes, this standards review tool infers undocumented project conventions by analyzing your code and documentation. It evaluates naming, file organization, and API patterns, then rates confidence on each inferred convention to help reviewers assess adherence.