staying-on-mission

Compare current actions against a written mission anchor and record a re-anchor, escalate, or stop decision.

33|Updated May 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FlyFission/nuclear-grade-context-engineering --skill staying-on-mission
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: staying-on-mission
Source: https://github.com/FlyFission/nuclear-grade-context-engineering/tree/main/skills/staying-on-mission
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FlyFission/nuclear-grade-context-engineering --skill staying-on-mission

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams maintain alignment between ongoing work and the original mission by detecting drift, enforcing decision discipline, and providing a structured path to re-anchor, escalate, or stop when the work deviates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces a written mission anchor with goal, success criteria, and non-goals.
  • Automatically evaluates current actions against the anchor and records a clear decision (re-anchor, escalate, or stop).
  • Supports long-running tasks and multi-agent work where scope drifts or standards slip.

Quick Start

Provide the current mission anchor and the action being performed, then run the drift-check to produce a decision and updated anchor if needed.

Frequently Asked Questions about staying-on-mission

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I detect mission drift in long-running projects with scope changes?

Mission drift is detected by comparing the current action diff against a written mission anchor file containing goals, success criteria, and non-goals to evaluate goal continuity and record a re-anchor, escalate, or stop decision.

What is a mission anchor and how does it enforce decision discipline?

A mission anchor is a written file like .nuclear/mission.md defining project goals, success criteria, and non-goals, used to evaluate ongoing actions and record structured decisions to re-anchor, escalate, or stop work.

How do I check if current work is still aligned with the original mission scope?

You can check alignment by running a drift-check that compares the current action diff against your explicit mission anchor file, producing a clear decision to re-anchor, escalate, or stop based on goal continuity.

Can I use this workflow for multi-agent tasks where standards slip over time?

Yes, this workflow supports long-running tasks and multi-agent work where scope drifts or standards slip across code, docs, or planning contexts by enforcing a written anchor and recording structured decisions.

Do I need a specific file format to track scope changes and re-anchor decisions?

You need an explicit mission anchor file such as .nuclear/mission.md or a defined Mission anchor section, plus the current action diff, to reason about goal continuity and produce re-anchor, escalate, or stop decisions.

When should I escalate or stop work instead of re-anchoring to the mission?

You escalate or stop when the current action diff shows the work deviates too far from the mission anchor's goals and non-goals to justify continuation, as determined by the drift-check evaluation process.