steel-quench

Run multi-wave adversarial reviews on near-complete artifacts and produce residual risk cards.

7|Updated May 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill steel-quench
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: steel-quench
Source: https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness/tree/main/plugins/fh-meta/skills/steel-quench
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/chrono-meta/forge-harness --skill steel-quench

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the dangerous vagueness of design anxiety by breaking it into concrete attack angles, defending against them, and explicitly stating residual risks before a project reaches completion.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Wave Adversarial Review: Runs challenger attacks across six mandatory angles including reason for existence, real-use verification, bus factor, platform obsolescence, self-referential structure, and gate-locality.
  • AI-Specific Threat Modeling: Meta-Aware Adversary mode targets AI-specific risks like hallucination, context collapse, prompt injection, and tool lock-in.
  • Gate-Passage Re-Attack: Wave-P3 re-attacks artifacts after upstream gates declare PASS, checking coverage gaps, narrative residue, and false confidence.
  • Use Case: Imagine you have a near-complete design document. Use this Skill to run an all-angle review that surfaces critical flaws, defends against them, and produces a residual risk card before the team commits to implementation.

Quick Start

Use the steel-quench skill to run an all-angle verification on the attached near-complete artifact and produce a residual risk card.

Frequently Asked Questions about steel-quench

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run adversarial verification on a near-complete design document?

Adversarial verification on a near-complete design document executes multi-wave challenger attacks across six mandatory angles to surface hidden design flaws, defends against them, and produces a residual risk card before project completion.

What is AI-specific threat modeling for design artifacts?

AI-specific threat modeling for design artifacts targets risks like hallucination, context collapse, prompt injection, and tool lock-in using a Meta-Aware Adversary mode during the adversarial review process.

Can I use this verification method on code artifacts and SKILL.md files?

Yes, you can apply systematic adversarial verification to code artifacts and SKILL.md files, running challenger attacks and defense rounds to surface hidden flaws and residual risks before completion.

Does adversarial artifact review require external CLI teams?

External CLI teams are optional for cross-team adversarial panels, but the core verification process requires the fh-commons:quench-challenger component to execute isolated challenger attacks.

How does gate-passage re-attack work after quality gates pass?

Gate-passage re-attack runs after upstream gates declare PASS, executing Wave-P3 attacks on artifacts to check for coverage gaps, narrative residue, and false confidence before final commitment.